Scholarly use cases

A Collection of Interesting Ideas,

Editors:
(IDLab - Ghent University)
(IDLab - Ghent University)

Abstract

TODO

1. Alice creates a scholary artefact

2. Bob want to know about Alices artefacts

NOTE: This is not a topic in scope of Mellon value chains and may be skipped for now

3. Alice can send a notification to a ServiceHub

4. Alice can see an overview of all notifications and events of her pod

5. Registration hub accepts Offers from Alice

6. Archival hub accepts services

7. Orchestrator suggests Services

E.g.

In the demonstrator one use case can be demonstrated:

8. Acknowledgement

We thank Herbert Van de Sompel, DANS + Ghent University, hvdesomp@gmail.com for the valuable input during this project.

Conformance

Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example” or are set apart from the normative text with class="example", like this:

This is an example of an informative example.

Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the normative text with class="note", like this:

Note, this is an informative note.

References

Normative References

[RFC2119]
S. Bradner. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119